Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research

Print ISSN: 2394-2746

Online ISSN: 2394-2754

CODEN : IJOGCS

Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research (IJOGR) open access, peer-reviewed quarterly journal publishing since 2014 and is published under auspices of the Innovative Education and Scientific Research Foundation (IESRF), aim to uplift researchers, scholars, academicians, and professionals in all academic and scientific disciplines. IESRF is dedicated to the transfer of technology and research by publishing scientific journals, research content, providing professional’s membership, and conducting conferences, seminars, and award more...

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article statistics

Viewed: 174

PDF Downloaded: 129


Get Permission Anand, Dahiya, Dahiya, and Madan: Navigating the unexpected: Insights into bladder injuries during emergency cesarean deliveries


Introduction

Cesarean section (CS) stands as a cornerstone in modern obstetric care, offering a lifeline in instances where vaginal delivery poses risks to maternal or fetal well-being.1 Widely practiced across the globe, CS addresses a spectrum of obstetric complications, safeguarding the health of both mother and child.2 However, akin to any surgical intervention, CS is not devoid of risks, among which bladder injury emerges as a notable concern.3 As the CS rate has increased, maternal mortality and morbidity have also risen steadily over the last three decades.4

Bladder injury is associated with an increased frequency of sepsis, venous thromboembolism, peritonitis, blood transfusions and longer hospital stays.5 Fortunately cesarean delivery has been associated with low rates of maternal morbidity and mortality over the past century. However, the most common complication of pelvic surgery is urologic injury, with bladder injury quoted as the most frequently injured organ during pelvic surgery.6 This injury, albeit rare, demands meticulous attention, particularly in the context of emergency cesarean sections.

In this light, exploring the multifactorial dynamics surrounding bladder injury during emergency cesarean sections becomes paramount. By unraveling the intricate interplay of variables contributing to this complication, healthcare providers can devise tailored strategies to minimize risk, enhance surgical precision, and ultimately elevate the standard of maternal care.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective analysis focused on emergency cesarean sections (CS) performed in Dept of obstetrics and gynaecology PGIMS Rohtak over a three-year period, specifically examining instances of bladder injuries during these procedures.

Study design

Retrospective Cohort Study: This study design involved analyzing historical data from emergency cesarean sections performed over a period of three-years from Jan 2020 to Dec 2022.

Data source

Surgical records and patient case sheets from the hospital’s medical records system were utilized.

Inclusion criteria

Cases of emergency cesarean sections performed during the study period were included in the analysis.

Relevant data for each case were extracted, including patient demographics (age, parity), gestational age, number of previous cesarean sections, type of placenta, timing of bladder injury during surgery, and severity of intraoperative adhesions. Bladder injuries were identified by reviewing surgical notes, operative reports, and discharge summaries for documented occurrences of bladder trauma or lacerations. The timing of bladder injury during surgery was categorized as occurring during the opening of the uterus, during uterine closure, or during other phases of the procedure. Intraoperative adhesions were graded based on the extent and density observed during surgery, ranging from mild to severe. Placental attachment was categorized as normal, placenta previa, or placenta accreta.

Descriptive statistics, including frequencies and percentages, were calculated to summarize the characteristics of bladder injuries and associated variables.

Ethical considerations

Institutional review board approval was obtained to ensure compliance with ethical standards for research involving human subjects. Patient confidentiality was strictly maintained by de-identifying and anonymizing all data during analysis and reporting.

By employing this detailed methodology, the study aimed to comprehensively investigate risk factors associated with bladder injury during emergency cesarean sections and contribute to the optimization of patient care in obstetric practice.

Results

The retrospective analysis examined 12218 emergency cesarean sections conducted over three years, revealing a bladder injury in 22 cases making an incidence rate of 0.18%. Distribution according to clinical variables revealed higher prevalence of bladder injury in cases of placenta previa, among patients aged 20-25 years, with higher parity (> Gravida 3), and in cases with advanced gestational age (>34 weeks).(Table 1)

Notably, the majority of bladder injuries (72.7%) occurred during the opening of uterovesical pouch emphasizing the susceptibility of the bladder during this phase (Table 3). Several risk factors were identified like a history of previous cesarean sections was associated with 13.6% of bladder injuries, while 4.5% occurred during second-stage cesareans. Additionally, 31.8% of bladder injuries were observed in cases of adherent placenta, and 50% were significantly associated with dense intraoperative adhesions (Table 5) Analysis by severity of adhesions demonstrated that bladder injuries correlated with severe adhesions in 36.3% of cases. Notably, the incidence of bladder injury increased with the number of previous cesarean sections. These findings provide crucial insights into the demographic and clinical characteristics associated with bladder injury during emergency cesarean sections, enabling targeted interventions and preventive strategies.

Table 1

Distribution of patients according to age, Parity and gestational age

S. No.

Age group

Number of patients

Percentage

1

20-25 years

10

45.4%

2

26- 30 years

7

31.8%

3

31-35 years

3

13.6%

4

> 35 years

2

9.09%

Parity

1

Gravia 1

0

2

Gravida 2

7

31.8%

3

Gravida 3

6

27.2%

4

> Gravida 3

9

40.9%

S. No

Gestational age

1

< 30 wks

2

9%

2

30 - 32 wks

1

4.5%

3

32 - 34 wks

2

9%

4

> 34 wks

17

77.2%

Table 2

Distribution of patients according to number of previous cesarean?

S. No

Number of previous LSCS

Number of patients

Percentage

1

Previous 1 LSCS

9

40%

2

Previous 2 LSCS

10

45.4%

3

Previous 3 LSCS

3

13.6%

Table 3

Risk factors associated with bladder injury in cesarean section patients

S. No.

Timing of Bladder injury

Nu of patients

1

Opening of peritoneum

1

2

Opening of uterovesical pouch

8

3

Opening of uterus

2

4

Adhesiolysis

11

Table 4

Distribution of patients according to site of injury at urinary bladder

S.No.

Site of injury

Nu of patients

Percentage

1

Dome

8

36.3%

2

Trigone

2

9.09%

3

Anterior wall

2

9.09%

4

Posterior wall

10

45.4%

Table 5

Distribution of patients according to severity of intraoperative adhesions

S. No.

Severity of adhesions

Nu of Patients

Percentage

1

Mild to moderate adhesions

3

13.6%

2

Severe adhesions

8

36.3%

3

Bladder adherent to uterus

11

50%

Table 6

Distribution of patients according to type of placenta

S. No.

Type of placenta

Number of patients

Percentage

1

Normal placenta

6

27.2%

2

Placenta previa

9

40.9%

3

Placenta accreta

7

31.8%

Discussion

The retrospective analysis of emergency cesarean sections conducted over three years provided valuable insights into the incidence and risk factors associated with bladder injury during such procedures. Our findings corroborate and expand upon existing literature, contributing to a deeper understanding of this complication.

In our study, the observed bladder injury incidence rate of 0.18% falls within the range reported by Rajasekar D et al.,7 indicating consistency across different cohorts and settings. The overall bladder injury incidence in a study was reported to be 0.22-0.44%. Furthermore, these rates are 0.11-0.42% for primary CS and 0.27-0.81% for repeat CS.8, 9, 10, 11 Repeat CS is the primary risk factor for bladder injury. This highlights the universal nature of the risk associated with bladder injury during emergency cesarean sections.

The study shows higher prevalence of bladder injury in cases of placenta previa, among patients aged 20-25 years, with higher parity (> Gravida 3), and in cases with advanced gestational age (>34 weeks), reflects similar trends reported by Kaskarelis et al. (1975) and Phillips et al. (2017).12, 13 Additionally, the increased incidence of bladder injury with the number of previous cesarean sections (Table 2) echoes the findings of previous studies (Rahman et al 2009), highlighting the cumulative risk associated with multiple cesarean deliveries.9

A notable finding from our analysis was the timing of bladder injury, with the majority (72.7%) occurring during the adhesiolysis and opening of the uterovesical pouch. This aligns with the results of a study, who reported a similar trend, emphasizing the vulnerability of the bladder during this critical phase of the procedure.8 Such consistency underscores the importance of careful dissection techniques to minimize the risk of inadvertent bladder injury.

Regarding risk factors, our study identified several significant contributors to bladder injury during emergency cesarean sections. Firstly, a history of previous cesarean sections was implicated in most of the cases of bladder injuries, consistent with the findings of Rahman et al. (2014).9 Scarring from previous surgeries can alter pelvic anatomy and increase the risk of bladder injury during subsequent procedures. Similarly, our observation of bladder injury occurring during second-stage cesarean sections echoes the findings of previous studies (Rahman et al., 2014; Johnson et al., 2017), highlighting the challenges and heightened risk associated with prolonged labor.9, 10

Furthermore, our study identified dense intraoperative adhesions as a significant risk factor for bladder injury, with 50% of cases demonstrating this association. This aligns with the findings of Tarney et al. (2013), who emphasized the role of adhesions in complicating cesarean sections and predisposing patients to bladder injury.6

In addition, our analysis revealed a significant association between bladder injury and adherent placenta, with 31.8% of cases demonstrating this risk factor (Table 6). This finding is consistent with the results of Mandip et al. (2020), who reported bladder injury in cases of morbidly adherent placenta, underscoring the increased risk in such scenarios.3

Further, in our study Bladder injuries during emergency cesarean sections exhibit varied distribution: dome (36.3%), trigone (9.09%), anterior wall (9.09%), and posterior wall (45.4%). (Table 4). Studies by Dodd et al., and Mandip et al. support these findings, emphasizing the significance of surgical precision to mitigate such injuries.3, 14

Moreover, our distribution analysis across various clinical variables provided insights into demographic and clinical characteristics associated with bladder injury.

In summary, our study contributes to the existing body of literature by reaffirming known risk factors for bladder injury during emergency cesarean sections and providing additional insights into the timing and distribution of such injuries. By corroborating and expanding upon findings from previous studies, our research enhances understanding of this important complication and informs strategies for its prevention and management.

Conclusion

Bladder injury during emergency cesarean sections represents a significant concern for maternal health. The findings of this retrospective analysis emphasize the importance of identifying and mitigating risk factors associated with bladder injury to enhance patient safety and improve maternal outcomes in emergency CS procedures.

Strategies aimed at preventing bladder injury, such as meticulous surgical technique, careful patient selection, and intraoperative vigilance, should be prioritized. Additionally, further research is warranted to explore additional factors contributing to bladder injury during emergency CS and to develop evidence-based interventions aimed at reducing its incidence and improving patient care.

Conflict of Interest

None.

Sources of Funding

None.

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Dr. Pushpa Dahiya, Head of department for her continuous support and motivation.

References

1 

Practice Bulletin No. 184: Vaginal Birth After Cesarean DeliveryObstet Gynecol2017130521733

2 

I Gurol-Urganci DA Cromwell LC Edozien GC Smith C Onwere TA Mahmood Risk of Placenta Previa in Second Birth after First Birth Cesarean Section: A Population-Based Study and Meta-AnalysisBMC Pregnancy Childbirth201111195

3 

P Manidip B Soma Cesarean bladder injury - obstetrician's nightmareJ Family Med Prim Care20209945269

4 

C Antoine BK Young Cesarean section one hundred years 1920-2020: the Good, the Bad and the UglyJ Perinat Med2020491516

5 

N Ibrahim AR Spence N Czuzoj-Shulman HA Abenhaim Incidence and risk factors of bladder injury during cesarean delivery: a cohort studyArch Gynecol Obstet20222730724018

6 

CM Tarney Bladder Injury During Cesarean DeliveryCurr Womens Health Rev201392706

7 

D Rajasekar M Hall Urinary tract injuries during obstetric interventionInt J Obstet Gynaecol199710467314

8 

MG Phipps B Watabe JL Clemons S Weitzen DL Myers Risk factors for bladder injury during cesarean deliveryObstet Gynecol2005105115660

9 

MS Rahman T Gasem SA Al Suleiman FE Al Jama S Burshaid J Rahman Bladder injuries during cesarean section in a University Hospital: a 25-year reviewArch Gynecol Obstet2009279334952

10 

S Morris J Turocy L Dabney A Hardart Bladder injury during cesarean delivery: a retrospective, 15-year studyObstet Gynecol20161273333

11 

AG Cahill MJ Stout DM Stamilio AO Odibo JF Peipert GA Macones Risk factors for bladder injury in patients with a prior hysterotomyObstet Gynecol2008112111620

12 

D Kaskarelis J Sakkas D Aravantinos S Michalas J Zolotas Urinary tract injuries in gynecological and obstetrical proceduresInt Surg1975601403

13 

B Phillips S Holzmer L Turco M Mirzaie E Mause A Mause Trauma to the bladder and ureter: a review of diagnosis, management, and prognosisEur J Trauma Emerg Surg201743676373

14 

JM Dodd CA Crowther Risks and Morbidity Associated with Previous Cesarean SectionWomen’s Health2007315561



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Article type

Original Article


Article page

438-441


Authors Details

Smriti Anand, Pushpa Dahiya, Sonia Dahiya, Shikha Madan*


Article History

Received : 12-03-2024

Accepted : 01-05-2024


Article Metrics


View Article As

 


Downlaod Files