- Visibility 25 Views
- Downloads 5 Downloads
- DOI 10.18231/j.ijogr.2022.095
-
CrossMark
- Citation
High risk pregnancies and implications of color Doppler
- Author Details:
-
Veena Vangani *
-
Mahendra Vangani
-
Bhavya Vangani
Introduction
Pregnancy can be considered as the most beautiful Period of a woman's life. The pregnancy is continuously observed by clinical examination, laboratory investigations and radio graphic examinations at exact intervals through its course.[1]
In obstetrics, the use of doppler ultrasound is to Study blood flow to assess fetal inaccessibility. Noninvasive investigation of feted circulation has become possible with the use of doppler as abnormal fetal circulation is considered a major factor in fetal growth restrictions.[2] Major cause of high risk pregnancies are pregnancy induced hypertension (PIH) or gestations hypertensions being one of the most common. Considering the above facts the present study in high risk pregnancy and to correlate the finding of doppler with clinical finding in high-risk pregnant women.[3], [4]
Materials and Methods
Total 100 were selected with purposive sampling technique, (50 cases) study group of high risk pregnancy taken into the study & compared with an equal number of women with normal pregnancy without complication. The color Doppler wave form of MCA umbilical artery was done for all cases b/w 28 to 37 weeks of gestation in both the groups.
Place & duration of study
Suryanagri hospital, Jodhpur, Rajasthan. One year (2019-2020).
Inclusion criteria
Women with gestational age greater than 34 weeks with risk factors like Anemia, Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy, GDM, Multiple pregnancies, IUGR, cardiac disease etc.
Exclusion criteria
Pregnancies with gestational age less than 34 weeks, post dated pregnancies etc.
Results
Variables Group A, |
Variables Group A n=100 (%) |
Variables Group B, n=100 (%) |
P ‑value |
Demography age groups in years |
|||
<24 |
14 |
27 |
0.023 |
24‑34 |
48 |
30 |
|
>34 |
37 |
44 |
|
Parity |
|||
Primipara |
13 |
21 |
0.039 |
Multipara |
87 |
79 |
|
Consanguinity |
|||
Yes |
21 |
13 |
0.97 |
No |
79 |
87 |
Variables Group A, |
Variables Group A n=100 (%) |
Variables Group B, n=100 (%) |
P‑value |
Amniotic fluid |
|||
Normal |
41 |
73 |
0.0283 |
Poly/oligohydromnios |
59 |
27 |
|
Labor induction |
|||
Yes |
15 |
09 |
0.22 |
Mode of delivery |
|
|
|
C‑section |
79 |
21 |
|
Gestational age |
|||
Pre‑term |
39 |
26 |
0.69 |
Normal |
88 |
94 |
|
Placenta |
|||
Abnormal location |
11 |
06 |
0.0471 |
Calcified |
01 |
00 |
Variables |
Emergency C‑section |
P‑value |
Risk of emergency C‑section in Group A (normal Doppler vs. abnormal Doppler) |
|
0.32008 |
Normal Doppler |
30 |
|
Abnormal Doppler |
13 |
|
|
|
|
Risk of emergency C‑section (normal Doppler in group A vs. group B without Doppler) |
|
|
Normal Doppler |
32 |
|
Group B with C‑section |
61 |
|
|
|
|
Risk of emergency C‑section (abnormal Doppler in group A vs. group B without Doppler) |
|
|
Abnormal Doppler with C‑section |
14 |
|
Group B with C‑section |
63 |
Discussion
In our study, it has conclusively proved that the resistance index in the MCA steadily declined as compared to the study group from 28-36 weeks.[5] When the maximum incidence of IUD is reported. Our study also shows that the A/B ratio in the MCA was the highest around 28 weeks of gestation & fall of A/B ratio is present up to term to facilitate increase blood flow. But this fall is statistically less than that of control group.[6] The MCA pulsatility index also showed a high at around 28 weeks with a study decline up to term which is significantly less than that of controls. The umbilical artery blood flow studies show that the peak.[7] PI levels are at 30 weeks of gestation with a study decline & at 36 weeks there is a rise showing that there is resistance to blood flow as compared to control group & there is steady decline at term. The pulsatility index in the high-risk group as showed steady decline up to 6 weeks & rise nearing term.[2] The A/B ratio in study group at around 30 weeks & study decline at 36 weeks & an abrupt ripe at term. In the control group the mean. A/B ratio steady decline in with minimum values at term.
Doppler measurements can be obtained from the umbilical artery (UA), middle cerebral artery (MCA), ductus venosus (DV) and uterine arteries. The pulsatility index (PI) and resistance index (RI) are used for the arteries and the peak velocity index (PVI) is used for the veins. Abnormal umbilical artery Doppler flow velocimetry is defined as a pulsatility index (PI) >2 standard deviations (SD) above the mean for gestational age and / or absence or reversal of end-diastolic flow. Umbilical artery Doppler reflects downstream placental vascular resistance, correlated with intrauterine growth restriction and the multisystem effects of placental deficiency. Abnormalities are progressive, with reduction, loss and finally a reversal of diastolic flow. When blood flow in the umbilical arteries become abnormal, the differentiation of fetus status requires Doppler information from systemic vessels, as middle cerebral artery and ductus venosus. The middle cerebral artery is the vessel of choice to assess the fetal cerebral circulation because it is easy to identify.[2] When the fetus is hypoxic, the cerebral arteries tend to become dilated in order to preserve the blood flow to the brain. In the middle cerebral artery, the systolic to diastolic (A/B) ratio will decrease (due to an increase in diastolic flow) in the presence of chronic hypoxic insult to the fetus. This increase in blood flow can be evidenced by Doppler ultrasound of the middle cerebral artery. This effect has been called "brain sparing effect" and is demonstrated by a lower value of the pulsatility index. In fetuses with intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) a pulsatility index below the normal range indicates a greater risk of adverse perinatal outcome. The brain sparing effect may be temporary, as reported during prolonged hypoxemia in animal experiments, and the overstressed human fetus can also lose the brain sparing effect. The disappearance of the brain sparing effect is a critical event for the fetus, and appears to precede fetal death.[8]
Doppler ultrasound of the umbilical artery is more helpful than other tests of fetal wellbeing, namely cardiotocography and biophysical profile score in distinguishing between the normal small fetus and the ‘sick’ small fetus.
The effects of Doppler ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies on obstetrical care and fetal outcomes were systematically reviewed (Neilson 2003).[9] The use of Doppler in pregnancies complicated by hypertension or presumed impaired fetal growth was associated with a trend in reduction of perinatal deaths.
Conclusion
Assessment of fetal well-being in high risk pregnancies is done by a variety of methods includes NST, biophysical profile & daily fetal movement count (DFMC). The positive predictive value for assessment of fetal Doppler flow velocimetry has revolutionized the diagnosis of abnormal blood flow the foeto-placental bed, & early identification of these abnormal patterns are useful in the determining the optimal time for delivery to reduce the perinatal mortality.
In high risk women like pre eclampsia, diabetes & IUGR. Color Doppler flow velocimetry done repeatedly can predict address foetal events with a great degree of accuracy. Results obtained in study where clinically & statistically significant. Every tertiary hospital should routinely make use of facility for the assessment of fetal well-being in high risk cases & ensure a better perinatal outcome.
Source of Funding
None.
Conflict of Interest
None.
References
- R Cruz-Martinez, F Figueras. The role of Doppler and placental screening. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2009. [Google Scholar]
- N AlQahtani. Doppler ultrasound in the assessment ofsuspected intra‑uterine growth restriction. Ann Afr Med 2011. [Google Scholar]
- M DeBono, RD Fawdry, RD Lilford. Site of trials for evaluationof antenatal tests of fetal wellbeing in high-risk pregnancy. J Perinat Med 1990. [Google Scholar]
- BJ Trudinger, CM Cook, RS Thompson, WB Giles, A Connelly. Low-dose aspirin therapy improves fetal weight in umbilical placental insufficiency. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988. [Google Scholar]
- A Jain, G Kumar, S Kharakwal. Placental thickness: a sonographic indicator of gestational age. J Obst Gyne India 2001. [Google Scholar]
- SN Tyrrell, RJ Lilford, HN Macdonald, EJ Nelson, J Porter, JK Gupta. Randomized comparison of routine vs highly selective use of Doppler ultrasound and biophysical scoringto investigate high risk pregnancies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990. [Google Scholar]
- A Imdad, MY Yakoob, S Siddiqui, ZA Bhutta. Screening andtriage of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) in generalpopulation and high risk pregnancies: A systematic reviewwith a focus on reduction of IUGR related stillbirths. BMC Public Health 2011. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- C Hoffman, HL Galan. Assessing the ‘at-risk’ fetus: Doppler ultrasound. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2009. [Google Scholar]
- JP Neilson, Z Alfirevic. Doppler ultrasound for fetal assessment in high risk pregnancies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]