Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research

Print ISSN: 2394-2746

Online ISSN: 2394-2754

CODEN : IJOGCS

Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research (IJOGR) open access, peer-reviewed quarterly journal publishing since 2014 and is published under auspices of the Innovative Education and Scientific Research Foundation (IESRF), aim to uplift researchers, scholars, academicians, and professionals in all academic and scientific disciplines. IESRF is dedicated to the transfer of technology and research by publishing scientific more...


  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article statistics

Viewed: 107

PDF Downloaded: 72


Aanandini, John, and Rathod: Antenatal umbilical cord coiling index as a predictor of pregnancy outcome


Introduction

Due to paucity of effective measures in the current antenatal risk assessment profiles, a substantial amount of neonatal morbidity exists. One of the main reasons is fetal distress which is of great concern to the obstetricians. Hence, antenatal risk assessment profiles need to be improved.1 Antenatal umbilical cord coiling index (AUCI) is one such non-invasive tool for improving the fetal outcome by early detection of pregnancies which need close antepartum and intrapartum monitoring and referring mother to an appropriate center.2, 3 According to the existing studies, intrauterine growth restriction was significantly associated with hypercoiled cords while low birth weight, meconium stained liquor and neonatal intensive care unit admissions were significantly higher in hypocoiled cords.4, 5 Observations from the current studies stated that abruptioplacentae, hypertensive disorders, preterm labour and oligohydramnios were found to have significant association with hypocoiling and polyhydramnios and diabetes mellitus were more with hypercoiling of umbilical cord. This study was undertaken to determine whether AUCI can be recommended as a routine procedure for early identification of adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Materials and Methods

This prospective analytical study was conducted in a teritary care hospital, in Pondicherry, from January 2019 to May 2020, after obtaining Institutional Human Ethics Committee approval. A sample size of 207 was calculated based on prevalence of abnormal coiling to be 16% with an α error – 0.05.2 Inclusion criteria was viable singleton pregnancy randomly chosen with gestational age of 28 weeks or above. Multiple pregnancies, intrauterine fetal demise, single umbilical artery and congenital anomalies were excluded. Women willing to participate in the study underwent doppler ultrasonography with Mindray DC-8, LOGIC GE S-7 machine and AUCI was measured by the reciprocal of the mean pitch up to three coils from different segments of umbilical cord. Measurement of this pitch defined as the distance in centimetres, from the inner edge of an arterial wall to the outer edge of the same arterial wall of the next coil ipsilaterally. Cord coiling was considered abnormal when it was less than 10th centile (hypocoil) and more than 90th centile (hypercoil) respectively. Participants were followed up till delivery and the pregnancy outcomes were noted.

Fetal heart rate abnormalities, meconium stained liquor, birth weight, APGAR <7 @ 5 minutes and need for NICU admission > 24 hours were noted as primary outcomes. Diabetes, hypertension, intrauterine growth restriction, oligohydramnios, prelabour rupture of membranes and polyhydramnios were noted as secondary outcomes. All the data was collected and analysed using an EPI INFO 7. Quantitative variables were analysed using mean, standard deviation and independent T test. Qualitative variables were analysed as percentage and using Chi Square test. p value of < 0.05 was taken as statistically significant.

Results

Out of 207 subjects, 10th percentile was noted for umbilical cord coiling index at 0.41 and 90th percentile at 0.61. Accordingly, umbilical cord coiling index was classified as normocoiling, hypocoiling and hypercoiling. Twenty subjects had AUCI of less than 0.41 and twenty one had greater than 0.61. The mean age of women in study group was 26.07 years. The mean age was noted to be 26.35, 26.41 and 25.47 years in hypocoiling, normocoiling and hypercoiling groups respectively. The proportion of primigravida patients were more in hypocoiling group i.e., 55% when compared to normocoiling and hypercoiling groups i.e., 45% and 52% respectively.(Table 1)

Regarding the primary outcomes, among 207 study participants, 19 women had foetal heart rate abnormalities, 3 from hypocoiling, 14 from normocoiling and 2 from hypercoiling groups respectively and there was no statistical significance between the three groups. The average weights of babies in these three groups were 2590, 3010 and 2860 gms respectively which was not statistically significant. 29 women had meconium stained liquor during labour, 4 in hypocoiling, 24 in normocoiling and 1 in hypercoiling groups respectively which had no statistical significance. Among the study participants, 4 women delivered babies with APGAR less than or equal to seven, 2 each in hypocoiling and normocoiling groups which was not statistically significant. A total of 4 babies got admitted to NICU, 2 each from hypocoiling and normocoiling groups. There was no statistical significance between the three groups regarding necessity for NICU admission. (Table 2)

Regarding maternal complications, pregnant women diagnosed as diabetics were 15(7.2%). Of these 2 were diagnosed to have overt diabetes. Among women in hypercoiling group out of 21, two were diabetics and it was not statistically significant. A total of 27 (13%) pregnant women were diagnosed to be hypertensive, 2 in hypocoiling, 24 in normocoiling and 1 in hypercoiling groups respectively. The difference between the three groups was not statistically significant. Among the hypocoiling and hypercoiling groups, 2 had oligohydramnios in each group whereas 10 from normocoiling group had the same which was not statistically significant. Two out of 207 patients were diagnosed as polyhydramnios. Among all the subjects, 14 had prelabour rupture of membranes, of which 13 were from normocoiling group and 1 from hypercoiling group which was not statistically significant. 4 women had intrauterine growth restriction, of which 3 cases were noted in normocoiling group and 1 in hypercoiling group which not statistically significant. (Table 3)

Table 1

Umbilical cordcoiling index

UCI

Value

n

Normocoiling

0.41 to 0.61

166

Hypocoiling

< 0.41

20

Hypercoiling

> 0.61

21

Table 2

Perinatal outcome

Perinatal outcome

Hypocoiling

Normocoiling

Hypercoiling

P value

FHR abnormalities

3(15%)

14(8%)

2(10%)

0.927

Mean weight of baby

2.59

3.01

2.86

6.515

Meconium stained liquor

4(20%)

24(15%))

1(5%)

2.114

APGAR below 7

2(10%)

2(1%)

0

7.747

NICU admission

2(10%)

2(1%)

0

7.747

Table 3

Maternal outcome

Materal outcomes

Hypocoiling

Normocoiling

Hypercoiling

P value

Diabetes

0

15(11%)

2(10%)

2.458

Hypertensives

2(10%)

24 (14%)

1(5%)

2.104

Oligohydramnios

2(10%)

10(6%)

2(10%)

0.73

Polyhydramnios

0

1(1%)

1(5%)

3.587

Prelabour rupture of membranes

0

13(8%)

1(5%)

1.884

Intrauterine growth retardation

0

3(2%)

1(5%)

1.295

Discussion

Mean umbilical cord coiling index of the present study was 0.5 + / - 0.1. According to various studies, it was noted to be 0.24 +/- 0.09, 0.19 +/- 0.1, 0.21 +/ - 0.07, 0.26 +/- 0.09, 0.2 +/- 0.09, and 0.13 + / - 0.08 by Chitra T et al, Rana J et al, Strong TH et al, Ezimokhai AM et al., Singh S et al and Ohno Y et al respectively.3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10

Regarding intrapartum events, a study conducted by Jain et al. concluded that nonreasssuring fetal heart rate was significantly associated with both hypocoiled and hypercoiled umbilical cords.11 This was in correlation with Mittal et al. and Pergialiotis et al.12, 13 However, in the present study, there was no such significance. Khan et al. concluded that there was no significant association between mode of delivery and umbilical cord coiling index which was in correlation with the study done by Dijk et al.14, 15 The present study also concluded the same. A study conducted by Razak K et al stated that hypocoiled cords were associated with more number of low birth weight babies.16 On the contrary, Tripathy et al stated that hypercoiled cords were associated with low birth weight.17 Tahmasebi et al. showed no significant association of AUCI with birth weight which was similar to the present study.18

Narayanan et al concluded that there was no association between umbilical cord coiling index and meconium stained liquor similar to Tahmasebi et al. 1, 18 However, Sd et al. stated that hypocoiled cords were significantly associated with it.19 In the present study, no such significance was found. Chitra T et al stated that there was significant association between hypercoiled cords and postpartum haemorrhage similar to Waboso et al.3, 20 The present study however did not show similar results. Gaikwad et al and Rohinidevi et al stated that low APGAR was associated with hypocoiling of umbilical cord at birth, 1 and 5 minutes whereas hypercoiling group didn’t show any such association.21, 22 This was in contrast to Sd et al, Predanic et al and the present study which stated that hypocoiling group showed no association significantly.19, 23 Gaikwad et al, Sd et al concluded that hypocoiling of umbilical cords were associated with more NICU admissions.19, 22 Rahi et al. showed that both hypocoiling and hypercoiling of umbilical cords were associated with more NICU admission.24 On the contrary, Agarwal et al stated that hypercoiling of umbilical cords were associated with NICU admission.25 However, in the present study, there was no statistical significance between all the 3 groups.

In a study by Najafi et al, there was a significant relationship between hypocoiling of umbilical cord and gestational / overt diabetes mellitus groups.2 On the contrary, Singh et al stated that hypercoiling of umbilical cords was associated with diabetes in pregnancy.9 Ennazhiyil et al in 2019, suggested that gestational diabetes was associated with abnormal umbilical coiling index.26 In the present study, there was no statistically significant association between all three groups. A study done by Milani et al, found a significant difference between abnormal umbilical cord coiling index and gestational hypertension.27 Lv et al. concluded that hypercoiling of cord was found more predominantly in pre-eclampsia patients.28 Similarly, a study done by Tripathy et al. concluded that there was a significant relationship between hypocoiling of umbilical cords and pregnancy induced hypertension.17 In the present study, there was no such significant association noted.

Regarding amount of amniotic fluid, Mittal et al concluded that hypocoiling was observed to be significantly associated with oligohydramnios.12 On the contrary, Mustafa et al found a significant relationship between hypercoiling of umbilical cord and oligohydramnios.29 However, the present study showed no such statistical significance. Regarding polyhydramnios, Guruswamy et al found significant relationship with hypocoiling whereas Mustafa et al found the same with hypercoiling with a p value of < 0.05.30, 29 In the present study, there was no statistical significance between the groups. A study by Chitra et al. stated that there was no significant association found between umbilical cord coiling index and prelabour rupture of membranes.3 Sahoo et al. also concluded that there was no significant association similar to the present study.31 Bhojwani et al. concluded that intrauterine growth restriction was statistically significant with hypercoiled umbilical cords similar to Sd et al.4, 19 This was in agreement with studies by Rahi et al and Laat et al.24, 32 In the present study, however, there was no statistical significance among the 3 groups.

Conclusion

In the present study there was no association between antenatal umbilical cord coiling index and adverse pregnancy outcome. However, the number of subjects with comorbidities was not significantly high enough for the desired population, to achieve a statistically significant value. In future, we suggest that more studies have to be done over high risk groups, to find the association of AUCI with pregnancy outcome.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

No conflicts of interest to be disclosed.

Acknowledgement

Department of OBGY, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Puducherry, India.

References

1 

A Narayanan P Ballal N Shetty P Kushtagi Antenatal umbilical cord parameters and perinatal outcomeInt J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol20165412115

2 

L Najafi ME Khamseh M Kashanian L Younesi A Abedini AE Valojerdi Antenatal umbilical coiling index in gestational diabetes mellitus and non-gestational diabetes pregnancyTaiwan J Obstet Gynecol201857448792

3 

T Chitra YS Sushanth S Raghavan Umbilical Coiling Index as a Marker of Perinatal Outcome: An Analytical StudyObstet Gynecol Int2012201216

4 

P Bhojwani R Sharma L Bhojwani B Bhatnagar Correlation of Antenatal Umbilical Cord Coiling Index with Perinatal Outcome Using Color Doppler at Late Second Trimester Int J Contemp Med Res2016393

5 

NS Patil Umbilical Cord Coiling Index and Perinatal OutcomeJ Clin Diagn Res20137816757

6 

J Rana GA Ebert KA Kappy Adverse perinatal outcome in patients with an abnormal umbilical coiling indexObstet Gynecol19958545737

7 

TH Strong DL Jarles JS Vega DB Feldman The umbilical coiling indexAm J Obstet Gynecol199417012932

8 

M Ezimokhai DE Rizk L Thomas Maternal risk factors for abnormal vascular coiling of the umbilical cordAm J Perinatol20001784415

9 

S Singh R Sharma G Radhakrishnan S Lakhanpal V Lakha Coils in Umbilical Cord and their Perinatal Significance in North Indian Population: A Cross-sectional StudyIndian J Neonatal Med Res20175314

10 

Y Ohno M Terauchi K Tamakoshi Perinatal outcomes of abnormal umbilical coiling according to a modified umbilical coiling indexJ Obstet Gynaecol Res20164211145763

11 

D Jain S Mathur Assessment of Antenatal Umbilical Coiling Index in Second Trimester as a Prognostic Marker of Perinatal OutcomeInt J Med Res Prof201731605

12 

A Mittal S Nanda J Sen Antenatal umbilical coiling index as a predictor of perinatal outcomeArch Gynecol Obstet201529147638

13 

V Pergialiotis P Kotrogianni D Koutaki E Christopoulos-Timogiannakis N Papantoniou G Daskalakis Umbilical cord coiling index for the prediction of adverse pregnancy outcomes: a meta-analysis and sequential analysisJ Matern Fetal Neonatal Med20191810.1080/14767058.2019.1594187

14 

DT Khan DR Thakur Association of postnatal umbilical coiling index with maternal & perinatal outcomeInt J Clin Obstet Gynaecol2019311449

15 

CC Van Dijk A Franx MWM Laat HW Bruinse, GHA Visser PGJ Nikkels The umbilical coiling index in normal pregnancyJ Matern Fetal Neonatal Med20021142803

16 

K Razak D Meena M Gl “Coils & Kinks”: A Novel Technique to Evaluate the Perinatal OutcomeGynecol Obstet201710.4172/2161-0932.1000457

17 

S Tripathy Umbilical Coiling Index and Its Relationship with Perinatal OutcomesIndian J Neonatal Med Res201424

18 

M Tahmasebi R Alighanbari Evaluation of umbilical cord thickness, cross-sectional area, and coiling index as predictors of pregnancy outcomeIndian J Radiol Imaging2011213195

19 

SD Prathibha Study of umbilical cord Coiling Index and Perinatal outcome at tertiary care hospitalInt J Clin Obstet Gynaecol201933636

20 

PA Feyi-Waboso Umbilical Cord Coiling Index in Women of South-Eastern NigeriaJ Women’s Health Issues Care201410.4172/2325-9795.1000158

21 

M Rohinidevi T Jeyasingh V Vimala Morphological study of umbilical cord and its embryological significanceInt J Anat Res20164118069

22 

P Gaikwad K Patole Umbilical Coiling Index and Perinatal OutcomeMVP J Med Sci201632118

23 

M Predanic SC Perni FA Chervenak Antenatal umbilical coiling index and Doppler flow characteristicsUltrasound Obstet Gynecol2006285699703

24 

S Rahi G Akther Relationship of umbilical coiling index and perinatal outcomeInt J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol20176104433

25 

S Agarwal RC Purohit G Jain DS Agarwal Umbilical Cord Coiling Index and Perinatal Outcome in Normal and Abnormal Pregnancies2014https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Umbilical-Cord-Coiling-Index-and-Perinatal-Outcome-Agarwal-Purohit/5b2940a4094d469d65f47106370554ad8061391e#citing-papers

26 

SV Ennazhiyil P Ramakrishnan V Akshara K Premlal S Chitra W Benjamin Effects of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus on Umbilical Cord Morphology: A Comparative StudyJ Clin Diagn Res20191371410.7860/JCDR/2019/40085.12543

27 

F Milani S Sharami E Lili F Ebrahimi SF DalilHeirati Association Between Umbilical Cord Coiling Index and Prenatal OutcomesInt J Womens Health Reprod Sci201878591

28 

LJ Lv LL Wu JY Wen Q Lei J Miao HL Duan Excessive umbilical cord coiling confers risk of elevated nocturnal blood pressure and severe/early-onset preeclampsiaJ Hypertens201937118796

29 

SJ Mustafa, AM Said Association of Umbilical Coiling Index in Normal And Complicated Pregnancieshttps://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Association-of-Umbilical-Coiling-Index-in-Normal-Mustafa-Said/501eb2058b32b37d23cdf20dee9471ad629ac24f

30 

U Gurusamy R Thangavelu C Venkataswamy Abnormalities of the umbilical cord: correlation with placental histology and perinatal outcomeInt J Res Med Sci2017511500916

31 

K Sahoo A Mahajan P Shaha NS Kshirsagar Evaluation of Umbilical Coiling Index as a Predictor of Pregnancy OutcomeInt J Health Sci201539

32 

MWM Laat ED Alderen A Franx GHA Visser ML Bots PGJ Nikkels The umbilical coiling index in complicated pregnancyEur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol200713016672



jats-html.xsl

© This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.


Article type

Original Article


Article page

383-387


Authors Details

Takkellapati Aanandini, Lopamudra B John*, Setu Rathod


Article History

Received : 05-04-2021

Accepted : 20-04-2021

Available online : 25-08-2021


Article Metrics


View Article As

 


Downlaod Files

   








Wiki in hindi