Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research

Print ISSN: 2394-2746

Online ISSN: 2394-2754

CODEN : IJOGCS

Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research (IJOGR) open access, peer-reviewed quarterly journal publishing since 2014 and is published under auspices of the Innovative Education and Scientific Research Foundation (IESRF), aim to uplift researchers, scholars, academicians, and professionals in all academic and scientific disciplines. IESRF is dedicated to the transfer of technology and research by publishing scientific more...


  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article statistics

Viewed: 146

PDF Downloaded: 88


Saketha, John, and Rathod: Risk factors, clinical presentation and management of ectopic pregnancy in a rural tertiary care centre- An observational study


Introduction

Implantation of a fertilised ovum outside the normal uterine cavity is called ectopic pregnancy.1 Of all the recognised pregnancies, the incidence of ectopic pregnancy is 2% approximately.2 Fallopian tube is the most commonest location for ectopic pregnancy (95%). In Fallopian tube, most common site is the ampulla, followed by isthmus, infundibulum and interstitium.3 Other less common sites are abdomen, ovary and cervix.4 Ectopic pregnancy is the most common life threatening emergency which can lead to maternal death. Increase in incidence of pelvic inflammatory disease, smoking in reproductive age group women, previous abdominal surgeries and the use of assisted reproductive techniques are the various risk factors for ectopic pregnancy.5

The clinical triad of ectopic pregnancy includes amenorrhoea, abdominal pain and bleeding per vagina. Other symptoms include haemorrhagic shock, passage of fleshy casts, fever and vomiting.6 The early diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy is due to improvement in non invasive techniques like transvaginal sonography and pregnancy tests in urine and serum.7 The clinical presentation of ectopic pregnancy has changed from life threatening disease requiring emergency surgery to a benign condition and in asymptomatic women nonsurgical treatment options are available now.

As ectopic pregnancy has variable presentations from asymptomatic to life threatening conditions, the aim of this study is to determine the risk factors, clinical presentations and study the management modalities and outcome, so as to make recommendations on interventions to reduce the morbidity of this condition.

Materials and Methods

This was an observational study that was conducted in a tertiary care centre after the approval of ethics committee between January 2019 to May 2020. Sample size calculated was 72. Inclusion criteria was all diagnosed cases of ectopic pregnancy. All suspected cases of intrauterine pregnancies and pregnancy of unknown location were excluded from the study. Ninety women with ectopic pregnancy who fulfilled the inclusion criteria and who were willing to participate in the study were recruited. Patients giving history of symptoms suggestive of ectopic pregnancy were subjected to urine pregnancy test and transvaginal ultrasound examination. Patients with positive urine pregnancy test without any intrauterine gestational sac were diagnosed as ectopic pregnancy based on USG features of adnexal mass and/or intraperitoneal free fluid suggestive of haemoperitoneum and were included in the study. Patients with positive urine pregnancy test who didn’t have such features in ultrasound were labelled as cases of pregnancy of unknown location and were kept under observation with serial beta hCG values and transvaginal ultrasound. Subsequent appearance of intrauterine gestational sac lead to exclusion of those patients and the remaining were diagnosed as cases of ectopic pregnancy and were included in the study group.

Parameters like age, blood group, parity, history of previous ectopic pregnancy, previous abdominal surgery, history of dilatation and curettage, pelvic inflammatory disease, usage of intrauterine device were studied. Symptoms like bleeding per vagina, amenorrhea, pain abdomen and shock were studied. Quantitative variables were analysed using mean, standard deviation and independent T test. Qualitative variables were analysed as percentage and using chi square test.

Results

In this study out of 90 patients majority belonged to age group of 21-30 years.65 patients (72%) were less than and 25(27.7%) patients were more than 30years of age. Majority i.e 32 (35.6%) were second gravidae. Only one patient was sixth gravida (1.1%). Majority i.e. 54(60%) had a parity of 1-2 and only 6(6.6%) patients had parity more than 4. 35(38.8%) patients were O positive and only 6(6.8%) patients had negative blood group.

Regarding risk factors, majority of patients 52(57.7%) had history of previous abdominal surgery, 2 patients (2.2%) had history of tuberculosis and 1 patient (1.1%) had history of intrauterine contraceptive device insertion. Previous ectopic pregnancy was seen in 4 patients (4.4%). Assisted reproduction techniques were seen in 9 patients (10%). 20 patients (22.2%) did not have any risk factors. 16 patients of this study i.e 17.7% were sterilised. 3 to 4 risk factors were seen in one patient hence total percentage was not counted to 100 percent. (Table 1)

Coming to clinical presentation, the symptom of amenorrhea was seen in majority of cases i.e 87 patients (96.6%). Shoulder tip pain was present in 2 (2.2%) and vomiting in 20 (22.2%) patients respectively. The classical triad of symptoms of amenorrhea, pain abdomen and bleeding per vaginum were seen in 27 (29.9%) patients only. (Table 2) Abdominal tenderness was seen in 49 patients (54.4%), fornicial tenderness in 33 patients (36.6%) and cervical motion tenderness in 23 patients (25.5%) whereas 16 patients (17.7%) did not have any signs. (Table 3)

In the present study 27 patients i.e (30%) had beta hCG values between 1000 to 2000 and 3 had values more than 30,000 i.e (3.3%). 25 patients i.e 27.7% had serum beta hCG values less than thousand. Ultrasonography showed free fluid in POD in majority of patients i.e (71.1%) and adnexal mass in 45 patients (50%). (Table 4)

Regarding management and it’s outcome, 69 (76.6%) were managed surgically and 13 patients (14.4%) were medically managed. For 8 patients (8.8%) expectant management was done. 2 patients who were managed medically later needed surgical intervention. Patients with haemoperitoneum who needed blood transfusion were 21(23.3%).

Table 1

Risk factors

Risk factors

No.

Percentage

Previous abdominal surgery

52

57.7

Spontaneous abortion

9

10

ART

9

10

Infertility

8

8.8

Previous ectopic pregnancy

4

4.4

Dilatation and curettage

7

7.7

TB

2

2.2

Nil

20

22.2

Table 2

Symptoms

Symptoms

No.

Percentage

Amenorrhea

87

96.6

Pain abdomen

73

81.1

Bleeding pv

53

58.8

Syncope

7

7.7

Vomiting

20

22.2

Passage of clots

9

10

Fever

2

2.2

Shoulder tip pain

2

2.2

Table 3

Signs

Signs

No.

Percentage

Nil

16

17.7

Abdominal tenderness

49

54.4

Fullness in fornix

13

14.4

Tenderness in fornix

33

36.6

Adnexal mass

1

1.1

Abdominal distension

4

4.4

Abdominal mass

1

1.1

Cervical motion tenderness

23

25.5

Table 4

USG findings

USG

No.

Percentage

Normal

2

2.2

Free fluid in POD

64

71.1

Adnexal mass

45

50

Gestational sac

17

18.8

Cardiac activity

4

4.4

Discussion

The present study was done in 90 patients diagnosed as ectopic pregnancy. Analysis of risk factors, clinical presentation and management was done. Majority (71.1%) were in the age group 21-30years.In the study done by Tay et al., the incidence of ectopic pregnancy was more in the age group of greater than 35 years which was similar to the studies done by Gracia et al.8, 9

Regarding risk factors, significant incidence of prolonged infertility and its relationship to ectopic pregnancy has been observed by several authors. According to studies by Rose et al., Hillis et al. and Savitha Devi et al., a positive history of infertility was present in 2.9%, 48.07% and 15.1% respectively.10, 11, 12 Primary infertility was also reported as a significant risk factor - 11.2% in the study by Kathpalia et al. and 21% by Priyadarshini et al.13, 14

The first IVF pregnancy was tubal ectopic pregnancy.15 According to Maymon R et al. assisted reproductive technology (ART) was reported to elevate the risk of extra uterine pregnancy from 0.025% to 1% in women who have undergone IVF.16 According to studies conducted by Tay et al., ectopic pregnancy was seen in 4% patients after ART.8 In studies done by Sivalingam et al. IVF was associated with 2-5% of ectopic pregnancy.2 In the present study also, ectopic pregnancy was seen in 9 patients who conceived after ART i.e 10%.

Literature shows that pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) is an important factor predisposing to the development of ectopic pregnancy. In our study no patient had history of episodes of acute PID, which is in contrast to the study done by Akande V et al where PID was linked to 30-50% of all ectopic pregnancies where Chlamydia trachomatis was the most common causative organism.17 According to studies by Hillis et al, Savitha Devi et al and Rose et al, the incidence of PID as a risk factor was 4, 25 and 34.4% respectively.11, 12, 10 However, in the present study history of pulmonary tuberculosis was seen in 2 patients i.e 2.2%, and we could not rule out the possibility of co existing genital tuberculosis. Genital TB was responsible for 13.2% of all cases of ectopic pregnancy in the study conducted by Sharma et al.18

In the study by Butt et al., risk factor of previous surgeries was seen in 2-13% cases of patients with ectopic gestation.19 In our study, a majority of 52 (57.7%) patients had history of previous abdominal surgeries.

According to Bouyer et al., the odds ratio for having ectopic pregnancy was 12.5 after one and 76.6 after previous two ectopic pregnancies.20 In the study by Barnhart et al, the recurrence rate of ectopic pregnancy was 5-25%.7 In this study of 90 patients, history of previous ectopic pregnancy was seen in 4 i.e 4.4%. A history of dilation and curettage has been associated with subsequent ectopic pregnancy in nearly 70% of cases according to study done by Panelli et al. whereas in the present study it was seen in only 7 patients i.e 7.7%.21

An intrauterine contraceptive device (IUCD) is the most significant risk factor, accounting for 57% to 90% of patients with ectopic pregnancy according to Sotelo et al.22 According to Marion et al. and Benagiano et al., in women with IUCD who became pregnant, 50% of such cases were ectopic.23, 24 However, in the present study, IUCD insertion history was present in only 1 patient.

Regarding clinical symptoms and signs, in studies conducted by Tay et al, 97% patients had abdominal pain, 79% had vaginal bleeding, 91% of patients had abdominal and 54% had adnexal tenderness.8 In a descriptive cross sectional study done in Abbottabad, 6675 patients were studied and 65 were found to be having ectopic pregnancies. Amenorrhea abdominal pain and vaginal bleeding were seen in 66.6%, 62.2% and 40% patients respectively.25 In the present study, 73 patients (81.1%) had abdominal pain, 53 (58.8%) had vaginal bleeding, 49 (54.4%) had abdominal tenderness and 33 (36.6%) had adnexal tenderness. Classical triad of amenorrhoea, abdominal pain and bleeding per vaginum was found in 53.84% cases in the study by Rajendra Wakankar et al. which is comparable to that done by Singh et al. (60%). In the present study the triad was seen in 30% of cases.26, 27

In studies conducted by Henderson et al. 26 patients (9%) had no bleeding per vaginum which is in contrast to this study where 58% patients had the same.28 Cervical motion tenderness was reported in 67% of cases by Sivalingam et al. whereas it was seen in 25% of cases in this study.2 22.2% had vomiting in the present study whereas Arora et al. showed 31% cases with vomiting.29 One-third of women with ectopic pregnancy had no clinical signs and 9% had no symptoms according to studies done by Alkatout et al. and Moore et al.30, 31 In this study 17% had no clinical signs suggestive of ectopic pregnancy.

In the study done by Kirk et al., 75% of tubal pregnancies were diagnosed during the first trans vaginal ultrasound.32 Study conducted by Crochet et al revealed that 88% had adnexal mass with absent intrauterine gestational sac. In the present study, adnexal mass was seen in 45 (50%) patients.

In study done by Jennifer Y Hsu et al. among 62,588 women with ectopic pregnancy 49,090 women (78.4%) underwent surgery and 13,498 women (21.6%) received medical management with methotrexate.33

In the present study also, a majority of 69 patients (76%) underwent surgery and 13 patients (14%) received medical management.

A meta-analysis showed success rates of 93% for multi-dose and 88% for single dose regimen according to Sivalingam et al.2 In the present study we followed single dose regimen for medical management. A randomised controlled trial done by VanMello et al. compared expectant management with the administration of a single dose of methotrexate and found that no significant difference existed between the two groups.34 In study by Moini et al. 2 patients who were managed expectantly required surgical intervention later similar to our study.35

Conclusion

Among patients who presented with ectopic gestation, majority belonged to the age group of 21-30years(71.1%). Regarding risk factors, history of previous abdominal surgery was the most important one i.e 52 cases (57.7%). Amenorrhea was the most common symptom and abdominal tenderness the commonest sign being present in 96.6% and 54.4% patients respectively. Free fluid in pouch of Douglas was the commonest finding (71.1%) in ultrasonogram. Surgical intervention was the main mode of management in 69(76.7%) patients since majority presented with ruptured ectopic with haemoperitoneum 42(46.7%). Medical management with methotrexate was successful in 84.6% cases (11 out of 13 cases) and expectant management in 8 cases.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

1 

JJ Walker Ectopic PregnancyClin Obstet Gynecol20075018999

2 

VN Sivalingam WC Duncan E Kirk LA Shephard AW Horne Diagnosis and management of ectopic pregnancyJ Fam Plann Reprod Health Care20113723140

3 

J Bouyer Sites of ectopic pregnancy: a 10 year population-based study of 1800 casesHum Reprod20021712322430

4 

EA Bachman K Barnhart Medical Management of Ectopic Pregnancy: A Comparison of RegimensClin Obstet Gynecol20125524407

5 

TA Abdulkareem SM Eidan Ectopic Pregnancy: Diagnosis, Prevention and Management. Obstetrics [Internet]2017https://www.intechopen.com/books/obstetrics/ectopic-pregnancy-diagnosis-prevention-and-management

6 

R-H Xie X Guo M Li Y Liao L Gaudet M Walker Risk factors and consequences of undiagnosed cesarean scar pregnancy: a cohort study in ChinaBMC Pregnancy Childbirth2019191383

7 

K Barnhart MD Sammel K Chung L Zhou AC Hummel W Guo Decline of serum human chorionic gonadotropin and spontaneous complete abortion: defining the normal curveObstet Gynecol2004104597581

8 

JI Tay J Moore JJ Walker Ectopic pregnancyWest J Med200017321314

9 

CR Gracia KT Barnhart Diagnosing ectopic pregnancy: decision analysis comparing six strategiesObstet Gynecol200197346470

10 

R Jophy A Thomas A Mhaskar Ectopic Pregnancy-5 Years ExperienceJ Obstet Gynecol India 2002544558

11 

SD Hillis LM Owens PA Marchbanks LE Amsterdam WR Mac Kenzie Recurrent chlamydial infections increase the risks of hospitalization for ectopic pregnancy and pelvic inflammatory diseaseAm J Obstet Gynecol199717611037

12 

D Savitha laparoscopic management of ectopic pregnancyJ Obstet Gynaecol India20005069

13 

SK Kathpalia D Arora N Sandhu P Sinha Ectopic pregnancy: Review of 80 casesMed J Armed Forces India20187421726

14 

B Priyadarshini R Padmasri TL Jnaneshwari KP Sowmya U Bhatara V Hema Ectopic pregnancy: a life-threatening gynecological emergencyInt J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol2017537004

15 

PC Steptoe RG Edwards Reimplantation of a human embryo with subsequent tubal pregnancyLancet197630779658802

16 

R Maymon A Shulman Controversies and problems in the current management of tubal pregnancyHum Reprod Update19962654151

17 

V Akande C Turner P Horner A Horne A Pacey On Behalf of the British Fertility Society. Impact of Chlamydia trachomatis in the reproductive setting: British Fertility Society Guidelines for practiceHum Fertil201013311525

18 

J B Sharma M Naha S Kumar K K Roy N Singh R Arora Genital tuberculosis: an important cause of ectopic pregnancy in IndiaIndian J Tuberc2014614312319

19 

S Butts M Sammel A Hummel J Chittams K Barnhart Risk factors and clinical features of recurrent ectopic pregnancy: a case control studyFertil Steril200380613404

20 

J Bouyer J Coste T Shojaei J-L Pouly H Fernandez L Gerbaud Risk Factors for Ectopic Pregnancy: A Comprehensive Analysis Based on a Large Case-Control, Population-based Study in FranceAm J Epidemiol2003157318594

21 

D M Panelli C H Phillips P C Brady Incidence, diagnosis and management of tubal and nontubal ectopic pregnancies: a reviewFertil Res Pract2015111515

22 

C Sotelo Ovarian Ectopic Pregnancy: A Clinical AnalysisJ Nurse Pract20191532247

23 

LL Marion GR Meeks Ectopic pregnancy: History, incidence, epidemiology, and risk factorsClin Obstet Gynecol201255237686

24 

G Benagiano H Gabelnick M Farris Contraceptive devices: intravaginal and intrauterine delivery systemsExpert Rev Med Devices20085563954

25 

A Islam A Fawad A A Shah H Jadoon I Sarwar A-U-N Abbasi Analysis Of Two Years Cases Of Ectopic PregnancyJ Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad JAMC20172916572

26 

R Wakankar K Kedar Ectopic Pregnancy - A rising TrendEctopic Pregnancy2015355

27 

S Singh G Mahendra S Vijayalakshmi RS Pukale Clinical Study of Ectopic Pregnancy in a Rural Setup: A Two Year SurveyNatl J Med Res201441379

28 

DN Henderson JLM Bean Early extrauterine pregnancyAm J Obstet Gynecol1950596122535

29 

R Arora AM Rathore S Habeebullah A Oumachigui Ectopic pregnancy--changing trendsJ Indian Med Assoc1998962537

30 

I Alkatout U Honemeyer A Strauss A Tinelli A Malvasi W Jonat Clinical diagnosis and treatment of ectopic pregnancyObstet Gynecol Surv201368857181

31 

L Moore Ectopic pregnancyNurs Stand R Coll Nurs G B198712384853

32 

E Kirk T Bourne Pregnancy of unknown locationObstet Gynaecol Reprod Med2009193803

33 

JY Hsu L Chen AR Gumer AI Tergas JY Hou WM Burke Disparities in the management of ectopic pregnancyAm J Obstet Gynecol2017217149

34 

NM Mello F Mol WM Ankum BW Mol F Veen PJ Hajenius Ectopic pregnancy: how the diagnostic and therapeutic management has changedFertil Steril2012985106673

35 

A Moini R Hosseini N Jahangiri M Shiva MR Akhoond Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: A case-control studyJ Res Med Sci Off J Isfahan Univ Med Sci20141998449



jats-html.xsl

© This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.


Article type

Original Article


Article page

296-300


Authors Details

Lingampalli Naga Saketha, Lopamudra B John*, Setu Rathod


Article History

Received : 11-03-2021

Accepted : 18-03-2021

Available online : 25-08-2021


Article Metrics


View Article As

 


Downlaod Files

   








Wiki in hindi