Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research

Print ISSN: 2394-2746

Online ISSN: 2394-2754


Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research (IJOGR) open access, peer-reviewed quarterly journal publishing since 2014 and is published under auspices of the Innovative Education and Scientific Research Foundation (IESRF), aim to uplift researchers, scholars, academicians, and professionals in all academic and scientific disciplines. IESRF is dedicated to the transfer of technology and research by publishing scientific more...

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article statistics

Viewed: 206

PDF Downloaded: 195

Mishra and Kasarla: Scar endometrioma in previous caesarean section: Two case reports with review of literature


Endometriosis is defined as unusual presence of functional endometrial tissue including both glands and stroma outside the uterine cavity, and when it is a well circumscribed mass called as endometrioma. Up to 22% of all age groups are affected by this common gynaecological condition among them reproductive and premenopausal age groups are 8-15% and 6% respectively.1

Scar endometriosis can be seen after obstetrics and gynaecological procedures such as caesarean section, episiotomy, hysterotomy, myomectomy, and tubal ligation. Horton et al in his systematic review stated that even though scar endometriosis being a rare entity this condition is becoming more common after caesarean section.2 Lack of awareness to this entity can lead to delayed or misdiagnosis, unnecessary procedures. Here we present two cases with caesarean scar endometrioma and review of literature which may help for earlier diagnosis and treatment by discussing its physical signs, symptoms, and radiological features.

Case History

Case one

A 25year old, para 1, abortion 1, live birth 1 reported to our Gynaecology outpatient with complaints of intermittent pain at caesarean scar site for 5 months. Her surgical history was significant with one caesarean section done 3 years ago and one suction and evacuation done 1 year ago. On physical examination, a 2x2cm nodule palpated at right corner of caesarean scar, which was slightly tender, firm in consistency with restricted mobility. Ultrasonography showed a distinct hypoechoic lesion with echogenic foci, measuring about 14x9mm seen in subcutaneous plain on right side of caesarean scar site [Figure 1]. A probable diagnosis of scar endometriosis was made and planned for surgical excision. A small transverse incision was given on right side of previous caesarean scar and 2.8x1.3x1.4cm mass was excised from above the rectus sheath. On cut section tissue was greyish white, solid, homogenous in appearance with brownish collection within [Figure 2]. Histopathological examination confirmed to be scar endometriosis by showing fibro collagenous tissue containing endometrial glands and stroma in it [Figure 3]. Patient was followed up for six months at regular times and she was asymptomatic.

Figure 1

Case 1 Ultrasonography image showing hypoechoic lesion with echogenic foci

Figure 2

Case 1 Resected endometrioma external (a) and cut surface (b) view

Figure 3

Case 1 Histopathology of resected specimen showing endometrial glands and stroma

Case two

A 23year old para 2, live birth 2 reported to our gynaecology outpatient department with complaints of pain in the lower abdomen near caesarean scar in the last 3 months. Patient described the pain as dull aching constant pain which aggravates during menstrual cycle. Her surgical history was significant with one caesarean section and bilateral tubal ligation done 2 years ago. On physical examination a 3x3cms nodule palpated at left corner of caesarean scar which was tender and firm with restricted mobility. Ultrasonography revealed heterogenous hypoechoic lesion of size 10.3x11.1x9.9mm, noted in subcutaneous plain scar in paramedian region in left iliac fossa adjacent to scar line [Figure 4]. Surgical excision was done, two nodules of size 2x1.5x1cm and 1.5x0.8x0.5cm were excised above the rectus sheath. On cut section tissue was greyish white, solid, homogenous in appearance with brownish stains over it [Figure 5]. Histopathological examination findings showed endometrial glands and stroma, fibrosis, and adipose tissue along with scattered lymphoid aggregates and thin walled blood vessels and confirmed it as scar endometriosis [Figure 6]. Patient was followed up for six months at regular times and she was asymptomatic.

Figure 4

Case 2 Ultrasonography image showing heterogenous hypoechoic lesion

Figure 5

Case 2 Resected Endometrioma external (a & b) and cut surface (c) view

Figure 6

Case 2 Histopathology of resected specimen showing endometrial glands and stroma


Several theories have been proposed to explain pathogenesis of endometriosis. Implantation theory or transplantation theory due to retrograde menstruation proposed by sampson explains Iatrogenic direct implantation leading to endometriosis in abdominal wall scar which states that viable endometrial cells seeps from the incision made in the uterus and gets seeded within the abdominal wound.1, 3 Later With adequate blood supply, nutrients, and under hormonal influences these endometrial cells proliferate and finally lead to scar endometriosis.

Coelomic metaplasia and Metastatic theory are other theories which explain endometriotic lesions. coelomic epithelium is common origin for both endometrial cells and peritoneal cells and according to coelomic metaplasia theory proposed by Meyer and Ivanoff, metaplasia of coelomic epithelium into endometrial cells give rise to endometriosis. The metastatic theory explains occurrence of rare sites of endometriosis which are far from the uterus, it states that functional endometrial cells might have been transported to extra uterine sites by blood vessels or the lymphatic system.4 Extrauterine endometrial cells which escaped from programmed cell death(apoptosis) gets attached to peritoneum and due to stimulation by osteoprotegerin, neovascularisation will lead to the proliferation of cells to develop an endometriotic lesion.4 Among all these theories Iatrogenic direct implantation theory seems to explain scar endometriosis in most plausible way.

Pasalega et al. in his study stated the risk assessment of endometriosis in scars. It is observed to be 2.7%, 1.5%, 0.5% following obstetric intervention, gynaecologic surgery, laparoscopic procedures, respectively.3 Douglas and Rotimi conducted a study which concluded that Pfannenstiel scar is the most common site of extra pelvic endometriosis.5 Scar endometriosis risk is greatly increased following caesarean section when compared to other gynaecological procedures.6

During caesarean section left over endometrial cells contaminating the wound is common and sometimes unavoidable but this leading to scar endometrioma is rare.7 Endometriosis at scar site may also occur due to the improper closing of peritoneum (parietal and visceral) and lack of care to prevent the spreading of endometrial cells during caesarean section.

The study by Zhang et al. provide the first evidence that in caesarean section Pfannenstiel incision has higher risk of scar endometriosis in comparison to the vertical midline incision.7 According to recent study conducted by Zhang et al. and another study conducted by Yan Ding et al. stated that mostly scar endometriomas are observed in the corners of scar.7, 8 This may be due to difficulty of removal of residual endometrial cells from the corners of incision site. Our 2 cases also support these studies as in both patients endometrioma were located at the corner of the scar. Caesarean scar endometriosis can also undergo malignant transformation and observed only 57% rate of survival.9 So, to prevent or decrease the incidence of scar endometriosis taking preventive measures is very crucial. On the basis of direct implantation or transplantation theory preventive measures like taking uterus outside of abdomen before giving incision over it, different needles should be used for closing uterus, peritoneum, and abdominal wall. Appropriate cleaning, flushing, irrigation before closure of abdomen. Avoiding usage of swab for cleaning uterine cavity after delivery and not including endometrial lining while suturing the incision of uterus.2

Abdominal wall scar endometrioma present as pain, swelling near scar which resembles surgical lesions like hernia, hematoma, granuloma, abscess, and tumours. In endometriosis pain is usually described as cyclical pain but constant and noncyclic pattern are also seen as reported in our cases. Time interval between caesarean section and occurrence of scar endometriosis vary from months to years (3 months to 10 years) according to different studies.

According to Hensen et al. Ultrasonography is the most cost-efficient, dependable, and convenient imaging for diagnosis of abdominal wall scar endometrioma.10 The mass may appear as a hypoechoic, heterogenous lesion with internal echoes, as seen in our both cases. Size of lesion, whether it lies above or below rectus sheath and important findings are identified through this imaging for planning surgical excision. MRI can be done for complex cases. Histopathological examination gives confirmed diagnosis showing endometrial gland and stroma in excised specimen. Wide surgical excision with clear margins considered as both diagnostic and therapeutic method.


Caesarean section scar endometrioma should be well thought out in women presenting with cyclical pain or constant pain with nodular mass in the expected region of Pfannenstiel scar. Due to increase in number of caesarean section incidence of scar endometrioma is also increased in recent past. A complete history and physical examination should be performed to have high reliableness with the diagnosis. For diagnosis Ultrasonography is the most useful and reliable investigation. Wide surgical excision with clear-cut boundary is both diagnostic and therapeutic intervention.

Source of Funding


Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.



Y Ding J Zhu A retrospective review of abdominal wall endometriosis in Shanghai, ChinaInt J Gynaecol Obstet2013121414


JD Horton KJ DeZee EP Ahnfeldt M Wagner Abdominal wall endometriosis: a surgeon's perspective and review of 445 casesAm J Surg200819622071210.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.07.035


M Paşalega C Mirea I D Vîlcea Parietal abdominal endometriosis following Cesarean sectionRom J Morphol Embryol2011525038


Y Osuga Current concepts of the pathogenesis of endometriosisReprod Med Biol2010911710.1007/s12522-009-0031-z


C Douglas O Rotimi Extragenital endometriosis--a clinicopathological review of a Glasgow hospital experience with case illustrationsJ Obstet Gynaecol2004247804810.1080/01443610400009568


NS Nominato LFVS Prates I Lauar J Morais L Maia S Geber Caesarean section greatly increases risk of scar endometriosisEur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol2010152183510.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.05.001


P Zhang Y Sun C Zhang Y Yang L Zhang N Wang Cesarean scar endometriosis: presentation of 198 cases and literature reviewBMC Women’s Health2019191


Y Ding J Zhu A retrospective review of abdominal wall endometriosis in Shanghai, ChinaInt J Gynaecol Obstet201312114145


VO Alberto M Lynch FN Labbei M Jeffers Primary abdominal wall clear cell carcinoma arising in a Caesarean section scar endometriosisIr J Med Sci20061751697110.1007/bf03169006


JHJ Hensen ACVB Vriesman JBCM Puylaert Abdominal Wall Endometriosis: Clinical Presentation and Imaging Features with Emphasis on SonographyAm J Roentgenol200618636162010.2214/ajr.04.1619


© This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License - Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Article type

Case Report

Article page


Authors Details

Abhipsa Mishra, Vyshnavi Kasarla

Article History

Received : 18-08-2020

Accepted : 18- 11-2020

Available online : 13-03-2021

Article Metrics

View Article As


Downlaod Files