Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research

Print ISSN: 2394-2746

Online ISSN: 2394-2754

CODEN : IJOGCS

Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Research (IJOGR) open access, peer-reviewed quarterly journal publishing since 2014 and is published under auspices of the Innovative Education and Scientific Research Foundation (IESRF), aim to uplift researchers, scholars, academicians, and professionals in all academic and scientific disciplines. IESRF is dedicated to the transfer of technology and research by publishing scientific more...


Article type

Original Article


Article page

95-99


Authors Details

Lavanyakumari Sarella, Vijayalakshmi Uthrakumar*


Article Metrics


View Article As

 


Downlaod Files

   






Article statistics

Viewed: 223

PDF Downloaded: 156


Induction of labour with oral misoprostol solution 20 microgram versus vaginal misoprostol 25 microgram 6th hourly


Original Article

Author Details : Lavanyakumari Sarella, Vijayalakshmi Uthrakumar*

Volume : 8, Issue : 1, Year : 2021

Article Page : 95-99

https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijogr.2021.019



Suggest article by email


Abstract

Background: Induction of labour is the artificial initiation of labour before the spontaneous onset, and it is the common obstetric intervention.
Aim: To compare the potency of oral misoprostol solution with vaginal misoprostol to induce labour at term.
Settings and Design: This randomized control study was carried out from July 2020 to September 2020 at Government General Hospital, Kakinada.
Materials and Methods: 80 women requiring induction were recruited in the study. The women were randomized to receive 20 micrograms of oral misoprostol solution every 2nd hourly or vaginally 25 micrograms of misoprostol every 6th hourly until the labour sets in the active phase of labour. Delivery within 24 hours was the outcome in the study.
Statistical Analysis: Data were documented in Microsoft excel and analyzed using SPSS software.
Results: 82.5% of women in the oral group delivered by spontaneous vaginal delivery, whereas 75% in the vaginal group. In the oral group, 37.5% of delivery occurred within 6-12 hours, 40% delivered within 12-18 hours duration, whereas in the vaginal group, 12.5% delivered within 6-12hours duration, 50% delivered within 12-18 hours duration. Oxytocin augmentation was required in 25% of the oral group, whereas 42.5% in the vaginal group. Meconium stained liquor was 12.5% in the oral group, whereas 20% in the vaginal group.12.5% underwent cesarean section in the oral group, 10% in the vaginal group.
Conclusion: Compared with vaginal misoprostol, oral misoprostol solution results in shorter induction delivery interval and less oxytocin augmentation required.

Keywords: Induction of labour, Oral misoprostol solution, Per vaginal misoprostol.


How to cite : Sarella L , Uthrakumar V , Induction of labour with oral misoprostol solution 20 microgram versus vaginal misoprostol 25 microgram 6th hourly. Indian J Obstet Gynecol Res 2021;8(1):95-99

Copyright © 2021 by author(s) and Indian J Obstet Gynecol Res. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (creativecommons.org)